Author Topic: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation  (Read 428563 times)

mike in calif

  • Guest
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1155 on: March 27, 2015, 01:23:35 PM »
WNW is the first 1/32 injection kit maker to venture into the 1920s,(Snipe...) so a Jenny would fit right in here I think.

Offline Eric Armstrong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
  • Expectation is a prison
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1156 on: March 28, 2015, 03:44:35 AM »
WNW is the first 1/32 injection kit maker to venture into the 1920s,(Snipe...) so a Jenny would fit right in here I think.

IIRC, Richard Alexander was quoted early on in WNW's existence that the Jenny was not in the cards as a planned release.  Circumstantial evidence suggests that those early plans have now changed.  Not surprising really.
Honor Necessity

Offline Des

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9325
    • ww1aircraftmodels.com
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1157 on: March 28, 2015, 07:07:20 AM »
He also said that they would never make a Sopwith Camel as there was already a good one out there, guess they had a re-think on that one as well  ???

Des.
Late Founder of ww1aircraftmodels.com and forum.ww1aircraftmodels.com

Offline stevie g

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1158 on: March 28, 2015, 07:39:14 AM »
I've missed where Wingnuts have stated that they are to do a camel, where is this statement ?

Offline RAGIII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18833
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1159 on: March 28, 2015, 07:57:32 AM »
I've missed where Wingnuts have stated that they are to do a camel, where is this statement ?

It was in an interview a couple of years ago now and was reiterated on facebook about 2 months ago during a survey of wanted kits. Richard said not to vote for a Camel as it was in development. I am sure Des or someone still has the link to the original statement.
RAGIII
"A man has to know his limitations": Harry Callahan

"Don't slop it on" Lynda Geisler

Offline dr 1 ace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2340
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1160 on: March 28, 2015, 08:02:55 AM »
He also said that they would never make a Sopwith Camel as there was already a good one out there, guess they had a re-think on that one as well  ???

Des.

I do not recall the words -"never"- being used...

Life is short, enjoy it, nobody gets out alive.

Offline Jamo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1115
  • Wellington, NZ
    • My Smugmug album
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1161 on: March 28, 2015, 09:54:49 AM »
Comment re Sopwith Came came out in the Feb-13 newsletter published by The Great War Special Interest Group of IPMS GB:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4x0GQLi-Oj2S1VxWHBZWTctb2s/edit?pli=1

Scroll down to p29. Excellent magazine by the way, I really should subscribe
Happy Modelling
James Fahey

Check out my massive photo collection here: https://jamesfahey.smugmug.com/

Offline Eric Armstrong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
  • Expectation is a prison
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1162 on: March 28, 2015, 01:42:13 PM »
He also said that they would never make a Sopwith Camel as there was already a good one out there, guess they had a re-think on that one as well  ???

Des.

I do not recall the words -"never"- being used...
Nor do I.  I doubt the words "never" have ever been used when R. Alexander has discussed possible future releases; unless, of course, someone asked if WNW was planning to do a Saturn V...
Honor Necessity

Offline Des

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9325
    • ww1aircraftmodels.com
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1163 on: March 28, 2015, 02:33:24 PM »
An extract from the Q and A article in Hyperscale June 2012


Q: Although the 2010 feature article on Wingnut Wings published on HyperScale stated there was no perceived need for a WNW Sopwith Camel due to the Hobbycraft kit, the Hobbycraft model is now unobtainable and many believe a Camel is a ‘natural” for Wingnut. Can you advise if Wingnut is working on a Camel? If not why not?

A: I can advise that we are not working on a Camel. Why not? Because we are currently working on models of aircraft from the Great War that have never been modelled in 1/32 scale. But this does not rule out the Camel (or any other subject for that matter) for sometime in the future. Never say never.

There you go, I should have said that he said they are not working on a Camel, my mistake, but the word "never"was used, I just got it in the wrong place, sorry that my memory is not the 100% that it used to be, I will hang my head in shame for making an honest mistake.

Des.
Late Founder of ww1aircraftmodels.com and forum.ww1aircraftmodels.com

Offline coyotemagic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7710
  • "Here's to not buggering it up." -Winston Chuchill
    • My Models
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1164 on: March 28, 2015, 04:14:01 PM »
Des, you shall stay in the comfy chair till lunch time with only a cup of coffee at eleven!
Cheers,
Bud the Inquisitor!
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream in the dark recesses of the night awake in the day to find all was vanity. But the dreamers of day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, and make it possible." -T. E. Lawrence

Offline boggie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1165 on: March 28, 2015, 05:09:37 PM »
He also said that they would never make a Sopwith Camel as there was already a good one out there, guess they had a re-think on that one as well  ???

Des.

Hi Des.  :)

I interpret your term "never" as an "exageration in support of explanation".   :D

regards,

boggie "the fair"  ;D

Offline Des

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9325
    • ww1aircraftmodels.com
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1166 on: March 28, 2015, 05:25:44 PM »
A Junkers D.1 would be fantastic along with a BE.2, an Avro 504 and a Jenny, would make for a good collection of aeroplanes.

Des.
Late Founder of ww1aircraftmodels.com and forum.ww1aircraftmodels.com

Offline Ernie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
  • "Once more into the breach"
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1167 on: March 28, 2015, 09:48:17 PM »
Maybe we should be speculating on which kit will disappear next...
I see the Alby (OAS) has now fallen by the wayside. ::)
I still am believing that this year we will see a Camel or Fokker tripe. ;D

Cheers,
Ernie :)

** wrong** see below!
« Last Edit: March 28, 2015, 09:53:17 PM by Ernie Parsons »
The new old guy, take two...

Offline Ernie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
  • "Once more into the breach"
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1168 on: March 28, 2015, 09:52:20 PM »
Eek! false alarm!  I goofed about the Alby OAW.  I should get these
old eyes checked.  My apologies to all! :-[ ::)

Humble Cheers,
Ernie :)
The new old guy, take two...

Offline Doug Mace

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Re: Time for the annual Wingnuts speculation
« Reply #1169 on: March 29, 2015, 02:49:16 AM »
As for a ship that I'm pretty certain is not represented by anyone, anywhere, in any scale, the ol' ground attack warhorse DH5 strapped with four 20# Coopers would be outstanding from WnW. A trim little bus, she was.                       -M
"Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes"  -   Oscar Wilde