Author Topic: Time for your input on future Forum content  (Read 7050 times)

Offline Dave W

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1608
Time for your input on future Forum content
« on: August 24, 2018, 07:41:16 PM »
As the Forum transitions toward the future I feel it's time to ask the members for your input on what you want to see on the Forum? What do you want more/ less of? What are we not doing that you want to see?

I would appreciate input from as many as possible to help make our Forum as good as it can possibly be and reflect your interests.

While we are at heart a WW1 aircraft forum, are you happy to see the inclusion of armour and vehicles too?

We have many boards here spanning a wide range of subjects. But are there more specialist topics or boards you would like to see?

What would you both like to see more or less of? And are there forum boards or topics that you feel we could drop?

Would you like more competitions? More tutorials? Photo features?

We used to have a Featured Modeller section. Would you like that revived? Or a featured model of the month?

This is not a poll as such, it's an opportunity for everyone to help shape the future direction and content of the Forum to make it as inclusive as possible and a true reflection of everyone's interests.

So please let's hear your thoughts, any and every idea welcomed!

Dave Wilson
Forum owner & Administrator
Gold Coast
Australia

Owner and Administrator of ww1aircraftmodels.com and forum.ww1aircraftmodels.com

Online PrzemoL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4888
  • There was Eru... and he made first the Ainur...
    • Przemysław Litewka
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2018, 09:54:03 PM »
First of all, thank you Dave for taking the duty to run this excellent Forum. And also for giving us the opportunity to express our wishes regarding its future. So here are a few of my comments/wishes.

While we are at heart a WW1 aircraft forum, are you happy to see the inclusion of armour and vehicles too?

This was the forum for WW1 Aviation from the onset. I do not see the point to expand the topic to land or sea. There is "Time to relax" section at the end of the forum, where builds, models etc. not related to WW1 aircraft can be presented. Many of us, me included, do so.

We have many boards here spanning a wide range of subjects. But are there more specialist topics or boards you would like to see?

I am not for too specialised subdivision of forum threads. What we have is already detailed enough. Even more...

What would you both like to see more or less of? And are there forum boards or topics that you feel we could drop?

... in my opinion the split of modelling section into ordinary, resin and scratch builds is not necessary. I would prefer to have build logs for all types of material/techniques in one place and obviously a separate section for completed models, again without a subdivision into materials or techniques.

And here, I have one wish, regarding the thread title layout. It is not easy to find all specific builds related to the same aircraft model. It is all due to the quite free, non-uniform title layouts in the threads. Could we not introduce the common, even obligatory layout, for instance - aircraft name, kit producer, scale? It would very much facilitate scrolling and searching.

Would you like more competitions? More tutorials? Photo features?

Competitions, group builds are all fun. They could return, even on a regular basis. It is always an opportunity to participate even more in our hobby or to stimulate the choice of the subject for the next project.

We used to have a Featured Modeller section. Would you like that revived? Or a featured model of the month?

That was a great section, we could know each other better even without meeting in real. I understand Des's worries when the forum became wide open to not registered people. But instead of just removing the contents he could have simply asked each of the featured modellers if they wished to have their content removed or if they agreed  - to have the files still available. Me, personally, I did not write anything in my file, that I would be ashamed of to expose to wider public. Yes, I would like to see that section back.

So, these are a few of my thoughts and proposals. And I surely wonder, what the others think about those issues.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2018, 07:17:30 PM by PrzemoL »
Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatuluk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.

Offline pepperman42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4437
  • Sergeant, my brown pants.......
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2018, 01:48:37 AM »
All great points by Przemol. One little addition is the "new replies to your posts" - I'm not sure I need to see everyone's reply to a person's introduction or a comment on a completed model  (other than from the original poster) Sounds crankier than I want and I have NO idea how you would filter that but just food for thought. Let me say I love this place and everything you do for it.

Steve

Offline James

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2018, 02:30:06 AM »
Would you like more competitions? More tutorials? Photo features?

Dave Wilson
Forum owner & Administrator
Gold Coast
Australia

I would LOVE to see more tutorials especially a step by step guide to rigging - explained as if one were a two year old - that would be me - especially interior rigging, cockpit, etc. I have a few Wingnut Wings kits and this may sound silly, but I'm scared to even attempt one not having built a World War I aircraft before.

What I think would be cool would be a World War I aircraft, unit history, etc. book review section.

James
Axes Grind and Maces Clash

Offline RLWP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
  • Bodger
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2018, 05:15:07 AM »
While we are at heart a WW1 aircraft forum, are you happy to see the inclusion of armour and vehicles too?

Not for me, allthough I'm happy to see this kind of thing in 'Time to Relax'. This forum is unusual because it's WWI aviation, and that's what makes it special to me

Quote
We have many boards here spanning a wide range of subjects. But are there more specialist topics or boards you would like to see?

What would you both like to see more or less of? And are there forum boards or topics that you feel we could drop?

I think there are far, far too many sections. Without some thought I'm not sure how to rationalise them but I'd be happy with half the number, even a third. I don't think the posts here need to be so finely categorised

Quote
Would you like more competitions? More tutorials? Photo features?

We used to have a Featured Modeller section. Would you like that revived? Or a featured model of the month?

Not sure either way about these. Competitions and group builds can be a good way of making deadlines to finish model. On the other hand, there seems to be a well motivated bunch of modellers here already.

What I would really, really like to see is some sort of software upgrade. I'm finding it challenging to remember the html codes I used to use all the time ten years ago on other forums. And there are a lot of modern features I'd  like to see here. Nothing flashy, just something a bit more current

Richard
Hendon for flying - the fastest way to the ground!

Offline RLWP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
  • Bodger
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2018, 05:16:39 AM »
All great points by Przemol. One little addition is the "new replies to your posts" - I'm not sure I need to see everyone's reply to a person's introduction or a comment on a completed model  (other than from the original poster) Sounds crankier than I want and I have NO idea how you would filter that but just food for thought. Let me say I love this place and everything you do for it.

Steve

It must be possible to do, I don't get this problem
Hendon for flying - the fastest way to the ground!

Offline fruibal

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2018, 01:50:24 PM »
Video tutorials would be cool!

Offline aliluke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2018, 03:16:00 PM »
Hi Dave
I'm in agreement with Przemol. Especially condensing the "Under Construction" to include all types of build. I'm also keen to keep it to aviation with land and sea in the "Time to Relax" section.

Also agree that more tutorials would be good but that takes someone time and commitment which may not be forthcoming?

Anyway it is good see this discussion taking place.

Thanks,
Alistair
It ain't a hobby if you have to hurry.

Offline Jeff K

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2018, 04:39:18 PM »
i'm very happy with what we've got here and the sense of community. thanks for taking the reins and keeping it true to Des' legacy. i don't see much i'd want to change, but i'd welcome a few very minor tweaks.

i also very much appreciate the tone: everyone's supportive and if anyone gets snarky they get shut down (a part of Des' legacy).

i have no problem with armor etc as long as it has its own section. i have zero interest in armor, but i have a big interest in 1/72 submarines, and will eventually do Max Kennedy Horton's E9. that'll have to be a scratch build, there isn't even a vacuform kit of it.

i like the idea of splits, but by subject matter not technique. if you think further subdivision's a good idea, maybe hashtags are the way forward?

I like Przemol's point about a recommended format for thread titles. i'd also like it if build threads MOVED to the completed builds section instead of requiring a separate thread.

one thing that irks me... i use "unread threads" a lot... and stuff drops off there even if i've not read it, just 'cause i have that tab open when i launch Chrome. not a big deal but would be nice if it can be set to stay open til i actually SEE the threads.

i like the idea of tutorials and stuff but that should be on the site not the forum. and there are plenty of worthy builds up in here already that can be 'promoted' to the site.


Offline Borsos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3321
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2018, 03:38:01 AM »
Hello Dave,

at first I would like to express my gratefullness for asking the forum members about their input. This is another of many points that show clearly that this forum is in very good hands.

As the Forum transitions toward the future I feel it's time to ask the members for your input on what you want to see on the Forum? What do you want more/ less of? What are we not doing that you want to see?

I would appreciate input from as many as possible to help make our Forum as good as it can possibly be and reflect your interests.



When I understood Des' view on his forum propperly, it was (and of course remains) mainly an aviation forum, but it was and should remain also a WWI forum. Des always was intersted in vehicles, tanks, guns or similar wwi stuff, he even built much of it for himself.

Dear fellow modellers, Just have a look at scalemates and search for any WW2 kit and you will see several injection molded kits of the same aircraft/vehicle/armour type and many many aftermarket articles like resin or PE parts. They even start to kit paper tanks, tanks that never were build in reality, just because the whole real stuff is already made as a kit. Their world is huge, the kits count by the thousands and it is only logical to focus on airplanes or tanks or whatever.
But this is simply not the case with WWI. In our beloved WWI world not even the half of the most important war machines are produced as a kit, e. g. " -- insert your favoured aircraft here --".
What I want to say with that is: WWI modelling is an absolute niche. WWI enthusiasts of all disciplines should therefore stick together and keep on thinking outside the box.
Everybody should have his or her own opinion, but I must say that I absolutely can't understand why vehicles and armour should be banned into "Time to relax" here. Let's not decrease the quality of this forum! If someone is not interested in WWI vehicles or armour/ guns -- just don't look at these posts. I personally would never touch a WWI ship's kit, but if anybody does and would show it here, why not? I would love to see it, as long as it's WWI.

[img]We have many boards here spanning a wide range of subjects. But are there more specialist topics or boards you would like to see?

Quote
What would you both like to see more or less of? And are there forum boards or topics that you feel we could drop?

I like how it is.

Quote
Would you like more competitions? More tutorials? Photo features?

I personally prefer the cooperation thing in modelling, not the competition thing. But groupbuilds are fun imo. Tutorials are great and highly appreciated.

Best regards
Andreas
"Deux armées aux prises, c'est une grande armée qui se suicide."
Barbusse.
"Ein Berg in Deutschland kann doch einen Berg in Frankreich nicht beleidigen. Oder ein Fluß oder ein Wald oder ein Weizenfeld."
Remarque.

Offline coyotemagic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7710
  • "Here's to not buggering it up." -Winston Chuchill
    • My Models
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2018, 03:58:04 AM »
Thank you so much, Dave, for stepping up and keeping this unique and wonderful forum alive. 

I agree 100% with Andreas on all points.  Des was a champion of all things WWI related and in his honor and memory I'd like to see thing remain as they are.  He was very much into group builds and I would like to see them return.  Also, the Featured Modeler section was a nice feature that Des introduced.  I'd like to see it back on the forum.

Thank you for checking with us, Dave.  You're a Prince among men.
Cheers,
Bud
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream in the dark recesses of the night awake in the day to find all was vanity. But the dreamers of day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, and make it possible." -T. E. Lawrence

Offline RAGIII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2018, 04:30:30 AM »
Thank you so much, Dave, for stepping up and keeping this unique and wonderful forum alive. 

I agree 100% with Andreas on all points.  Des was a champion of all things WWI related and in his honor and memory I'd like to see thing remain as they are.  He was very much into group builds and I would like to see them return.  Also, the Featured Modeler section was a nice feature that Des introduced.  I'd like to see it back on the forum.

Thank you for checking with us, Dave.  You're a Prince among men.
Cheers,
Bud

I AGREE COMPLETELY AND THOROUGHLY with Andreas and of course My Amigo Bud. Andreas just beat me to the trigger on posting very similar thoughts! Yes I was shouting my reply!
RAGIII
"A man has to know his limitations": Harry Callahan

"Don't slop it on" Lynda Geisler

Offline smperry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2018, 05:47:51 AM »
Perhaps as a concession to us MCAs, Metrically Challenged Americans, the conversion factor from mm to inches, (0.03937) could be added to the tutorials. It would help Newbees to order the correct size line, wire, tube and bits.
sp
The proud owner of a recently delivered spool of 0.12 INCH Maxima Chameleon line for which I have no immediate use :-)
There is something fundamentally amiss with a society which forces it's modelers to work for a living.

Offline RAGIII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2018, 06:13:52 AM »
Perhaps as a concession to us MCAs, Metrically Challenged Americans, the conversion factor from mm to inches, (0.03937) could be added to the tutorials. It would help Newbees to order the correct size line, wire, tube and bits.
sp
The proud owner of a recently delivered spool of 0.12 INCH Maxima Chameleon line for which I have no immediate use :-)

OK, I will concede on this one :-)
RAGIII
"A man has to know his limitations": Harry Callahan

"Don't slop it on" Lynda Geisler

Offline lcarroll

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8554
Re: Time for your input on future Forum content
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2018, 09:41:51 AM »
The proud owner of a recently delivered spool of 0.12 INCH Maxima Chameleon line for which I have no immediate use :-)

    I'm still chuckling, too funny! :) ;D ;D As an advanced age Canadian who tolerates our (imposed) metric official system I can relate! Couldn't agree more, my brain is already challenged by the effects of aging and this proposed addition would allow me to remove my constant conversion function from the equation!
Cheers,
Lance