Author Topic: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)  (Read 37194 times)

Offline GAJouette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3579
  • " Beware of the Spanish Inquisition"
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2012, 04:57:59 AM »
  Kevin,
Somehow I'd managed to miss this thread until now. Outstanding work to date my old friend. I love your machine work to the metal panels.
Highest Regards,
Gregory Jouette
" What Me Worry"

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2012, 05:45:53 AM »
Thanks fellas, I appreciate the input.
Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Chris Johnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1959
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2012, 08:49:14 AM »
Replicating the swirl pattern looks fraught with difficulty to me, but you take to it like a duck to water. Great job!

Cheers,

Chris
You can have it good; You can have it fast; you can have it cheap. Pick any two, but all three are impossible.

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #33 on: October 28, 2012, 12:13:02 PM »
Wheels given a base coat of tire gray.

Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #34 on: October 28, 2012, 12:15:45 PM »
Wings given a base coat of Tamiya Buff. I'll highlight the ribs later, and add some dirt and stains.

Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #35 on: October 28, 2012, 12:17:53 PM »
Interior fabric areas also receive Tamiya Buff.

Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #36 on: October 28, 2012, 12:19:49 PM »
Seat and cushion base coated, more or less following WNW recommendations.

Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #37 on: November 14, 2012, 09:50:36 AM »
Went to (finally), do some more painting on this today, painting the tires first with a lighter gray (may still be too dark, but I can live with it), only to discover that my CO2 tank is virtually empty. Very frustrating, but I’ll run out and get a refill tomorrow. I’ve been involved in other stuff the last couple of weeks, and valve may not have been closed tightly enough, allowing all the air (600psi), to leak out.

Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline pepperman42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4503
  • Sergeant, my brown pants.......
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #38 on: November 15, 2012, 04:23:42 AM »
Nice work. Im just catching up on this thread. Let me get this straight (and be lazy by not looking it up myself) -  the Master jackets are for later Fokkers and Alby's etc NOT the EIII's.

Steve

Offline Des

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9325
    • ww1aircraftmodels.com
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #39 on: November 15, 2012, 06:21:58 AM »
Coming along very nicely Kevin, it's all looking really good. I didn't know about the machine gun difference either, I will have to look into it. Sorry to hear about your gas loss, a real bummer when things like that happen.

Des.
Late Founder of ww1aircraftmodels.com and forum.ww1aircraftmodels.com

Offline kornbeef

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 961
  • U.K. Carpet monster genocide squad leader.
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #40 on: November 15, 2012, 07:57:11 AM »
Nice work. Im just catching up on this thread. Let me get this straight (and be lazy by not looking it up myself) -  the Master jackets are for later Fokkers and Alby's etc NOT the EIII's.

Steve
Yes thats right, the EIII uses a IMG08 Maxim and the later A/C use LMG08/15 Maxim's. I remember something being said by Richard Alexander when people were mistakenly fitting after market jackets to the Hansa Brandenberg, a point I remembered as the Rumpler uses the IMG08 too.  The easiest way to identify which is the fact the top pf the main body on the IMG08 is flat, on the LMG08/15 its stepped down behind the breech assembly.

Keith
Never too old to learn sumfink noo

Offline petero

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #41 on: November 15, 2012, 09:53:14 AM »
Is there any particular reason why the PE jackets in the kit need replacing?  Or are the Master guns just better or more detailed overall?

I'm waiting for my E.III to arrive, and I'm a total WWI newbie, so I'm curious.

Peter

Offline modelguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #42 on: November 15, 2012, 10:06:14 AM »
Just getting back in guys. You are doimg a great job on your EIII, Kev. I am working on mine as well.
Watch this space

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #43 on: November 15, 2012, 10:42:49 AM »
Nice work. Im just catching up on this thread. Let me get this straight (and be lazy by not looking it up myself) -  the Master jackets are for later Fokkers and Alby's etc NOT the EIII's.

Steve

That's what Korn says, and he's probably right, though I'm not real certain it'll bother me for it to be incorrect.
Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)

Offline Fokker boy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: 1:32 WNW Fokker E.III (or perhaps E.II)
« Reply #44 on: November 15, 2012, 10:44:40 AM »
Coming along very nicely Kevin, it's all looking really good. I didn't know about the machine gun difference either, I will have to look into it. Sorry to hear about your gas loss, a real bummer when things like that happen.

Des.

Yep, 600psi lost. My new tank (just picked up today), is currently reading 700psi, so I'm good to go.
Kevin

(30 years ago I started off with nothing, and I've still got most of it!)