Author Topic: DH2 - The "Whirling Incinerator"  (Read 1187 times)

Offline eindecker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
  • The penultimate word in scale modeling since 1956
    • Models In Scale
DH2 - The "Whirling Incinerator"
« on: August 31, 2014, 04:20:34 AM »
I've been re-reading Denis Winter's The First of the Few, which I highly recommend, and twice he states that WWI British pilots referred to the DH2 as the "whirling incinerator". Anyone know the derivation of this? Whirling, from the pusher prop? Incinerator due to it's propensity to catch fire when not engaged in combat, or as a result of it?
Michael Scott
Author of "The Q Fragments" http://Http://theqfragments.com & Amazon for paperback and Kindle.

Offline uncletony

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4349
    • Aircraft In Pixels
Re: DH2 - The "Whirling Incinerator"
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2014, 06:39:51 AM »
I've been re-reading Denis Winter's The First of the Few, which I highly recommend, and twice he states that WWI British pilots referred to the DH2 as the "whirling incinerator". Anyone know the derivation of this? Whirling, from the pusher prop? Incinerator due to it's propensity to catch fire when not engaged in combat, or as a result of it?

"Whirling" for it's supposed propensity to enter a spin, recovery from which was not widely understood or taught. Pilots distrusted it, the story goes, until Hawker demonstrated spin recovery to his squadron.

"Incinerator" for its supposed propensity to catch fire when hit, but I think in this regard it wasn't any worse than any other fighter of the day...

Offline Old Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: DH2 - The "Whirling Incinerator"
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2014, 02:33:37 PM »
At the beginning of the type's active service with 24 Squadron, there were several incidents in which Dh-2s descending to land after patrol went into spins, crashed, and burned. It had a bad effect on the unit, and led to the nickname. A pusher type crashing nose first would be not only particularly prone to fire, but to trapping its pilot in the blaze, since both fuel tank and motor would be above (behind) him when the impact occurred. It was determined that what caused these crashes was cold. The pilot of a pusher drew no warmth from the engine at all, and sat essentially unprotected in a very stiff wind, bitterly cold always at altitude but especially so in winter when 24 began operations. After a couple of hours of this, a man's extremities could grow numb, to a degree that made working the controls difficult. Combine this with the tricky business of coming down to land, and misadventure could result, even for a skilled pilot. Improved clothing, a warmer season coming up, and increased understanding of how to avoid and how to get out of a spin, reduced the accident rate and incidence of such casualties, but the name did stick, and in any kind of a nose-down impact, the pilot or crew of any pusher type always was in dire straits.

On edit: I have always understood the name to be 'spinning incinerator', by the way.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2014, 02:47:08 PM by Old Man »