Author Topic: Technical aspects of the Maxim Type Machine Gun in air combat  (Read 1255 times)

Offline GHE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Technical aspects of the Maxim Type Machine Gun in air combat
« on: November 01, 2012, 11:27:28 PM »
Meine Herren !

"... I saw the pilot hammering onto his machine guns...."   

The watercooled Vickers .303 Mg  and the aircooled LMG 08/15 (L=leicht /light) are direct copies from Hiram Maxims
invention.
The ammo used was the Lee-Enfield cartridge 0.303/7,69mm  and the Mauser K98 cartridge 7,92 mmm
The pressure on the gun lock was very high, some 45.000 to 55.000 pounds per square inch.
Production tolerances were tight.

Both machine guns were sensitive to ammunition quality, climate conditions , mechanical abrasion and failure of mechanical parts.
Compared to WW 2 machine guns the gun lock mechanism looks huge, a real block.
Often large mechanical parts have to endure more stress under very fast movement than smaller parts - likewise in a car engine
for example.
Though well made it was a matter of metallurgy that made them relatively huge, since Maxim still used a lot of expensive brass
parts on his first guns.
When you can't afford the material for mass production or new metals are not yet invented parts cannot be made smaller
having the same ability to endure that same stress.

The combat conditions to the Mg under flying conditions were different and the Maxim was not built for those conditions.
Different expansibilities of the metal parts due to climate conditions and temperature differences produced by the machine itself
are to be taken into account.
To fight icecold temperature the Sopwith Camel used a heating tube to the Vickers guns to keep them warm.
Oil: of course, the lubricating oil for weapons reacts to temperature differences, becoming stiff or loosing the lubricating effect to overheating.
especially long bursts caused the lubricant to evaporate resulting in malfunction.

Those effects made the system prone to jam.
It often occurs and is mentioned by the pilot's reports regularly.

The next "jammer" - a word close to the German word for lamentation = Jammern - and indeed it is a misery when in combat
your guns are jamming - was not the belt but ammo quality tolerance-wise.
Often the cartridge case was out of tolerance and caused jamming.
The next reason was a cartridge that broke apart and the tracer ammunition  was prone to plug the barrel.

On the positive side the hammer position clearly indicated the cause of stoppage.
The hammer (this outside visible rapid moving device) made an arc of - 55° to + 55° , meaning a total of 110°.
Jamming caused a stop in 4  positions: #1  backwards  #2 vertical   # 3 full forward  # 4 full forward downwards locking in;

# 1 and # 4: the pilot had to move the hammer total backwards to remove the bad case/cartridge
#2 : the pilot had to use a wooden/metal hammer to hammer the hammer into position #4
#2-stoppage caused by a broken cartridge meant that the next cartridge was moved into the remnants of the broken one
thus pluging the chamber or the barrel; this was not repairable by the pilot, only by the ground crew...

Indeed it is a outrageous thing to clear ones guns amidst a dog-fight....

The phosphorus tracer ammo:
In literature it is often exagerrated- that everyone from every angle was able to see tracer ammo; that is not true.
Normally you see it from behind or the pursued pilot when it comes flying along one's path.

Ballistic curve:
 The ballistic curve of a tracer bullet was not the same as the real bullet then; it lost height faster than the normal round.
This often mislead while aiming at  an adversary's crate.

Judging the reports it really wasn't  just a matter of course to hit anything .
Especially two-seaters were even more dangerous to fight than single-seaters.

viele Grüße, Gunther
« Last Edit: November 03, 2012, 04:49:42 AM by GHE »
LZeppelin rocks!

Offline GHE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Technical aspects of the Maxim Type Machine Gun in air combat
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 02:10:57 AM »
Meine Herren !

Literature recommendation

Robert Bruce   Machine Guns of World War I
Live Firing Classic Military Weapons in Colour Photographs


Gunther
LZeppelin rocks!

Offline GHE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Amount of Ammo in a German fighter biplane
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2012, 01:59:37 AM »
Messieurs !

As far as I found out the typical amount of  ammo on a German fighte biplane was around 600 rounds for both machine guns.
Sustained fire could be kept for some 40 seconds; that means the typicall WW2 fighter doubled the time.

Long time I never gave it a thought. But that means that the pilot had to think  when to pull the trigger and how long.

The so-called dog-fight already was largely out of fashion in WW2 and became a hit-and-run method then .*
The real dog-fight (Luftkampf= lit. airfight) with KURBELN (movement to start an engine with a crank) is the thing of the
WW 1 fighters.

* the ambushing of bombers by night fighters for ex. is not a dog-fight.

Boelcke's methods may have roots in limited ammo/firing time, too: you have to gain the better position for the coup de grace.
You cannot dog-fight around and around- your ammo soon will be spent.

Only movie pyro technicians seem to have rounds in abundance...
viele Grüße, Gunther
LZeppelin rocks!